Tag Archives: Social Networking

HTC Thunderbolt Smartphone – Impressions

I’m writing this now because the “Bolt” is available from Verizon for less than $50 with a new two-year contract.  Comparable phones are a lot more.  There might be a temptation to spend the extra bucks or wait until they come down in price, but that’s hardly necessary, as you’ll see.

I’ve had my Thunderbolt for about four months.  I’m actually on my second, because I discovered on this summer’s trip to the High Plains that they don’t do well when falling onto concrete from the seat of an Explorer, even with a protective skin.  The screen didn’t break, but its spirit departed instantly. I took it to Verizon and had a new phone the second day, via FedEx.  Popped in the SIM and SD card, downloaded my backed-up apps, contacts and tunes, and I was good to go.

Ah, the screen! — glorious at 4.3 inches diagonally (about 9-1/2 square inches).  I think 4 to 4.5″ is about as big as is practical for a phone.  Any bigger and it would be difficult to manipulate with one hand, and would cease to be really pocket-sized.  The colors are brilliant, detail excellent.  I’ve compared it side-by-side with the iPhone and my old eyes can’t tell the difference, although the numbers make it sound inferior. Numbers aren’t always the answer. Continue reading

Do social networking sites turn teens into substance abusers?

I don’t buy it.

Read why: Do social networking sites turn teens into substance abusers?

Some Interesting Prophecy — Can mobile phones change human history? Are they already doing it?

If you’re not interested in Social Anthropology, just quit reading right here.

History of cellphones = History of Culture?

About three years ago I read this article and, seeing the potential for following the idea, saved it in a file to be read in July of this year.  I just reread it.  Wow!  In the light of current events and the recent past events, it makes Mark Pesce look almost clairvoyant.  I commend it to those so inclined.  Scroll down to the second article on the page.

Last month, The Economist, that fountainhead of Ur-Liberalism, proclaimed humanity “halfway there.” Somewhere in the last few months, half the population of the planet became mobile telephone subscribers. In a decade’s time we’ve gone from half the world having never made a telephone call to half the world owning their own mobile.

It took nearly a decade to get to the first billion, four years to the second, eighteen months to the third, and—sometime during 2011—over five billion of us will be connected. Mobile handsets will soon be in the hands of everyone except the billion and a half extremely poor; microfinance organizations like Bangladesh’s Grameen Bank work hard to ensure that even this destitute minority have access to mobiles. Why? Mobiles may be the most potent tool yet invented for the elimination of poverty.

To those of us in the developed word this seems a questionable assertion. For us, mobiles are mainly social accelerants: no one is ever late anymore, just delayed. But, for entire populations who have never had access to instantaneous global communication, the mobile unleashes the innate, inherent and inalienable capabilities of sociability. Sociability has always been the cornerstone to human effectiveness. Being social has always been the best way to get ahead.