Comments on the liberal orgy over Ms. Palin’s pregnancy:

September 3, 2008

I posted this as a comment over on Barbara O’Brien’s MahaBlog, and liked it so much I just copied and pasted it here.

While I’m enjoying all this as much as anyone else, I think we have to be very careful. If the Republicans spin this right — and remember that their spinmeisters are the best around — they can make all us liberal, family disruptin’, baby-hatin’, abortionist fags look pretty bad to their constituents.

Remember that many of those folks don’t care about the pregnancy and the facts surrounding it. All that many of them will see is the good little family, Mom standing by her kids, taking care of business and doing her all to make their world a better place while her hero son goes off ta fight them heathen terrorists in Eye-rak.

Teenage pregnancies don’t bother these folks. If they did, they wouldn’t fight tooth and nail to keep their kids from having coherent information about sex. (Wonder if “the condom broke” with Bristol and swain, or if they just lacked the necessary information?) Lies obviously don’t bother them: look at how they justified (a religious term, by the way — look it up) Bush’s with regard to Iraq and a variety of other issues. As long as the kids get married and keep on squirting out little Republican Fundamentalists every year or so, the Right will forgive all.

They’ll forgive Gov. Palin as well. (You really must look up “justification.” It’s an education in itself.) She’s one of them. The more we dig, the harder they’ll dig in. The media, us liberal and progressive bloggers and others with a leftist axe to grind need to be very careful, attacking on issues of substance only, and bearing down hard, not attacking circumstances that could happen in anyone’s family.

That’s not smart. Not smart at all.

Yet another thought.

Let’s say you’re one of a young — or not so young — couple whose lives were permanently changed by a moment of carelessness in the back seat. Whose family stood by you. Who are having a hard time, and maybe just beginning to think that Barack Obama and the Democrats might have some of the answers to make your life a little bit easier.

Then those same Democrats start raining on a family that is going through exactly what you went through. Who would you be liable to identify with?

I’m telling you, it isn’t a smart move. Not smart at all.

2 Responses leave one →
  1. September 4, 2008

    Well said Bill, and I agree. Hands off. The media seems to think this is “news” but in reality, it is personal and they should back off of it.

    At least these youngsters have some kind of family unit to fall back on for support, most of society isn’t that way. I say leave ‘em alone.

    Another thing that is irritating me is Jimmy Carter and some of these other media

    folks prattling about McCain’s POW status. He should be able to bring it up any time he wants to, and I don’t care how many times he mentions it. He earned the right … Carter didn’t. And nine out of ten media hacks didn’t either if the truth be known.

    DS

    I have no problem at all with his trumpeting his experiences to the skies. I just think it makes him look as though he believes he has little else to recommend him, which suits me fine.

    Mr. McCain is a hero. Established. Old news. However, I don’t see how his having been unfortunate enough to run into a SAM with his jet forty years ago has anything at all to do with his fitness to be president, any more than my experiences as a young pilot bear on my ability to do my job today. The facts are, John McCain is the grandson of a 4-star admiral, the son of a 4-star admiral, and got his appointment to the academy as a legacy. He got through training as a naval aviator (no small feat), flew jets, got shot down, spent time as a POW, married into money, and became a US Senator. His accumulated experience from that point seems to be far more important.

    As to President Carter, keep in mind that he was career Navy, captain of a nuclear submarine, and an academy grad himself. It seems to me that those credentials and his experience as president make him uniquely qualified to comment on Mr. McCain’s suitability for the job.

    On this one, my friend, I think we must agree to disagree.

  2. September 5, 2008

    Okay, no problem with that, thanks for setting me straight on Carter.

    DS

    Don,

    Well, sort of…

    In the interest of accuracy, I checked further into Carter, since it has been a long time and I wasn’t sure of my details. It turns out that he was qualified to command submarines, and was for a time senior officer on the pre-commissioning crew of SSN-575 (Seawolf), the second nuclear sub in the US Navy, but did not actually command it. That billet eventually went to CDR R. B. Laning.

    See the letter here, excerpted below:

    After graduation, Jimmy Carter served as a surface warfare officer for a two years and then volunteered for the submarine force. He served in a variety of billets, including engineer officer of diesel submarines and qualified to command submarines.

    In November 1952, he began a three month temporary duty assignment at the Naval Reactor branch. He started nuclear power school (a six month course of study that leads to operator training) in March, 1953. In July 1953, his father passed away and he resigned his commission to run the family peanut farm. He was discharged from active duty on 9 October, 1953. According to an old friend of mine who served as Rickover’s personnel officer at Naval Reactors, LT Carter did not complete nuclear power school because of the need to take care of business at home.

    The third and last boat of the new Seawolf class of attack submarine, SSN-23, is named USS Jimmy Carter.

    bw

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS